Health Education & Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, E. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 7, No. 2, 95-106 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/109019818000700201

A Framework for Optimizing Resource Allocation for Health Education Programs

Edward E. Bartlett, M.P.H.

Division of Health Education, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21205

Health education programs conventionally are implemented in four sites: school, clinical, occupational, and community settings. One problem encountered by health education specialists, community health planners, and policy makers, is ascertaining the optimal allocation of health education resources to these four settings. This paper proposes a framework to assist in making this decision. The framework incorporates considerations of the target group, the health problem, the desired health behaviors, andad ministrative aspects of the program, which are broken down into 26 different "criteria", (e.g., age of target group, stage of disease intervention). Each of the 26 criteria has its respective "dimensions" (e.g., age of target group: pre school children, school children, and adults), and each dimension in turn suggests the optimal health education setting(s). An improved under standing of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing health edu cation programs in the different sites will facilitate better coordination be tween practitioners in school, clinical, occupational, and community settings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?