|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Behavioral Constructs and Mammography in Five Ethnic Groups
Susan L. Stewart, PhD
Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, SStewart{at}cc.ucsf.edu
William Rakowski, PhD
Department of Community Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Rena J. Pasick, DrPH
Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco
Intention, self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, and subjective norms are key constructs of health behavior theories; their predictive validity for cancer screening has not been ascertained in multiethnic populations. Participants were 1,463 African American, Chinese, Filipina, Latina, and White women aged 40 to 74 interviewed by telephone in their preferred languages. The relationship between baseline constructs and mammography 2 years later was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Intention predicted mammography overall and among Whites (odds ratio [OR] = 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.4, 10), with racial/ethnic differences in association (p = .020). Self-efficacy predicted mammography overall and among Whites (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.1, 11), with no racial/ethnic interaction. Perceived benefits and subjective norms were associated with screening overall and in some racial/ethnic groups. These results generally support cross-cultural applicability of four of the five constructs to screening with mixed predictive value of measures across racial/ethnic groups. Additional in-depth inquiry is required to refine assessment of constructs.
Key Words: perceived benefits perceived susceptibility self-efficacy intention subjective norms cross-cultural measurement
Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 36, No. 5 Suppl,
36S-54S (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1090198109338918

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Pasick, N. J. Burke, J. C. Barker, G. Joseph, J. A. Bird, R. Otero-Sabogal, N. Tuason, S. L. Stewart, W. Rakowski, M. A. Clark, et al.
Behavioral Theory in a Diverse Society: Like a Compass on Mars
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2009;
36(5_suppl):
11S - 35S.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Joseph, N. J. Burke, N. Tuason, J. C. Barker, and R. J. Pasick
Perceived Susceptibility to Illness and Perceived Benefits of Preventive Care: An Exploration of Behavioral Theory Constructs in a Transcultural Context
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2009;
36(5_suppl):
71S - 90S.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Pasick, J. C. Barker, R. Otero-Sabogal, N. J. Burke, G. Joseph, and C. Guerra
Intention, Subjective Norms, and Cancer Screening in the Context of Relational Culture
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2009;
36(5_suppl):
91S - 110S.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. J. Burke, J. A. Bird, M. A. Clark, W. Rakowski, C. Guerra, J. C. Barker, and R. J. Pasick
Social and Cultural Meanings of Self-Efficacy
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2009;
36(5_suppl):
111S - 128S.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. K. Washington, N. J. Burke, G. Joseph, C. Guerra, and R. J. Pasick
Adult Daughters' Influence on Mothers' Health-Related Decision Making: An Expansion of the Subjective Norms Construct
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2009;
36(5_suppl):
129S - 144S.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Rothman
Capitalizing on Opportunities to Refine Health Behavior Theories
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2009;
36(5_suppl):
150S - 155S.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. L. Sanders Thompson
Cultural Context and Modification of Behavior Change Theory
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2009;
36(5_suppl):
156S - 160S.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Zapka and C. Cranos
Behavioral Theory in the Context of Applied Cancer Screening Research
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2009;
36(5_suppl):
161S - 166S.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Pasick, N. J. Burke, and G. Joseph
Behavioral Theory and Culture Special Issue: Authors' Response to Commentaries
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2009;
36(5_suppl):
167S - 171S.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|