| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Vaccine Risk/Benefit Communication: Effect of an Educational Package for Public Health NursesLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport Shreveport, Departments of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, 1501 Kings Hwy., Shreveport, LA 71130;tdavis1{at}lsuhsc.edu
University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport The purpose of this study was to determine whether an in-service for public health nurses (PHNs) and accompanying educational materials could improve vaccine risk/benefit communication. The content and timing of vaccine communication were recorded during 246 pre-and 217 postintervention visits in two public health immunization clinics. Pre-/postintervention comparisons showed PHN communication of severe side effects (13% vs. 44%, p < .0001) and their management (29% vs. 60%, p < .0001) increased. There was no significant change in discussion of vaccine benefits (48% vs. 51%) or common side effects (91% vs. 92%),screening for contraindications (71% vs. 77%), or distribution of written information (89% vs. 92%). More parents initiated vaccine questions postintervention (27% vs. 39%,p < .01) and were more satisfied with vaccine-risk communication (8.1 vs. 8.9 on a 10-point scale, p < .01). Average vaccine communication time increased from 16 to 22 seconds (p < .01).
Key Words: childhood immunization public health health education risk communication literacy
This version was published on December
1, 2006 Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 33, No. 6,
787-801 (2006) |
|
||

