| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/1090198105275047 Collective Actors and Corporate Targets in Tobacco Control: A Cross-National ComparisonDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Cross-national comparative analysis of tobacco control strategies can alert health advocates to how opportunities for public health action, types of action, and probabilities for success are shaped by political systems and cultures. This article is based on case studies of tobacco control in the United States, Canada, Britain, and France. Two questions are addressed: (a) To whom were the dangers of smoking attributed? and (b) What was the role of collective actiongrassroots level organizationin combating these dangers? Activists in Canada, Britain, and France moved earlier than the United States did to target the tobacco industry and the state. Locally based advocacy centered on passive smoking has been far more important in the United States. The author concludes that U.S.-style advocacy has played a major role in this countrys smoking decline but is insufficient in and of itself to change the corporate practices of a wealthy and politically powerful industry.
Key Words: tobacco control smoking cross-national advocacy tobacco industry
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
