|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Participation in Recreational Physical Activity: Why Do Socioeconomic Groups Differ?
Nicola W. Burton, BSC(Hons), MPsych(Clinical)
Gavin Turrell, PhD
Brian Oldenburg, PhD
This qualitative study explored how influences on recreational physical activity (RPA) were patterned by socioeconomic position. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 10 males and 10 females in three socioeconomic groups (N = 60). Influences salient across all groups included previous opportunities, physical health, social assistance, safety, environmental aesthetics and urban design, physical and health benefits, and barriers of self-consciousness, low skill, and weather/time of year. Influences more salient to the high socioeconomic group included social benefits, achieving a balanced lifestyle, and the barrier of an unpredictable lifestyle. Influences more salient to the high and mid socioeconomic groups included efficacy, perceived need, activity demands, affiliation, emotional benefits, and the barrier of competing demands. Influences more salient to the low socioeconomic group included poor health and barriers of inconvenient access and low personal functioning. Data suggest that efforts to increase RPA in the population should include both general and socioeconomically targeted strategies.
Key Words: physical activity determinants socioeconomic status (SES) physical environment psychosocial
Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 30, No. 2,
225-244 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1090198102251036

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Simmons, H. M. Mavoa, A. C. Bell, M. De Courten, D. Schaaf, J. Schultz, and B. A. Swinburn
Creating community action plans for obesity prevention using the ANGELO (Analysis Grid for Elements Linked to Obesity) Framework
Health Promot. Int.,
December 1, 2009;
24(4):
311 - 324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Janssen, T. Sugiyama, E. Winkler, H. de Vries, F. te Poel, and N. Owen
Psychosocial correlates of leisure-time walking among Australian adults of lower and higher socio-economic status
Health Educ. Res.,
March 23, 2009;
(2009)
cyp012v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. J. Cleland, K. Ball, J. Salmon, A. F. Timperio, and D. A. Crawford
Personal, social and environmental correlates of resilience to physical inactivity among women from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds
Health Educ. Res.,
October 29, 2008;
(2008)
cyn054v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ball, A. Timperio, J. Salmon, B. Giles-Corti, R. Roberts, and D. Crawford
Personal, social and environmental determinants of educational inequalities in walking: a multilevel study
J Epidemiol Community Health,
February 1, 2007;
61(2):
108 - 114.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Barrett, R. C. Plotnikoff, K. S. Courneya, and K. D. Raine
Physical Activity and Type 2 Diabetes: Exploring the Role of Gender and Income
The Diabetes Educator,
January 1, 2007;
33(1):
128 - 143.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (25 Apr 2003 to 18 Jul 2003)
Evid. Based Nurs.,
October 1, 2003;
6(4):
e1 - 12.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|
|