|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Mammography Promotion by Volunteers in Rural Communities
M. Robyn Andersen, PhD, MPH
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washingtonrander{at}fhcrc.org
Michelle Hager, BS
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
Celina Su, BA
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Nicole Urban, ScD
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
The Community Trial of Breast Cancer Screening Promotion assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by community volunteer groups in rural areas using three different intervention approaches: individual counseling, community activities, and a combined intervention including both. Societal costs of the interventions were calculated and used in conjunction with measures of effectiveness to calculate cost-effectiveness in terms of cost per additional mammogram and cost per year of life saved. Methods of collecting and using cost information to assess the cost-effectiveness of community interventions are described. The Community Activities intervention was found to be the most cost-effective, at approximately $2,000 for each additional regular mammography user in the community. The cost per year of life saved associated with mammography promotion was approximately $56,000 per year of life saved. Exploratory analyses suggest that the most cost-effective method of promoting mammography use may vary with the target population.
Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 6,
755-770 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/109019802237942

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Paskett, C. Tatum, J. Rushing, R. Michielutte, R. Bell, K. L. Foley, M. Bittoni, S. L. Dickinson, A. S. McAlearney, and K. Reeves
Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women.
J Natl Cancer Inst,
September 6, 2006;
98(17):
1226 - 1237.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Lairson, Y.-C. Chang, J. L. Bettencourt, S. W. Vernon, and A. Greisinger
Estimating Development Cost for a Tailored Interactive Computer Program to Enhance Colorectal Cancer Screening Compliance
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.,
September 1, 2006;
13(5):
476 - 484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Wolf, K. A. Fitzner, E. F. Powell, K. R. McCaffrey, A. S. Pickard, J. M. McKoy, J. Lindenberg, G. T. Schumock, K. R. Carson, M. R. Ferreira, et al.
Costs and Cost Effectiveness of a Health Care Provider-Directed Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Veterans
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 1, 2005;
23(34):
8877 - 8883.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Roetzheim, L. K. Christman, P. B. Jacobsen, A. B. Cantor, J. Schroeder, R. Abdulla, S. Hunter, T. N. Chirikos, and J. P. Krischer
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Cancer Screening Among Attendees of Community Health Centers
Ann. Fam. Med,
July 1, 2004;
2(4):
294 - 300.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. M. Linden, S. Ramsey, and N. Anderson
An Ounce of Prevention or a Pound of Cure? Investing to Improve Breast Cancer Outcomes for African American Women
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2004;
22(13):
2517 - 2518.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|