|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Evaluation of a Three-Year School-Based Intervention to Increase Adolescent Sun Protection
John B. Lowe, DrPH
Center for Health Promotion and Cancer Prevention Research, Medical School, University of Queensland, Herston Road, Herston QLD Australia 4006; Phone: +61 (7) 3365 5344; fax: +61 (7) 3365 5540j.lowe{at}mailbox.uq.edu.au
Kevin P. Balanda, PhD
Warren R. Stanton, PhD
Amaya Gillespie, PhD
The efficacy of a school-based intervention was evaluated using a randomized controlled trial in Australia. In consecutive grades (8, 9, and 10), students in the intervention group received components of a program that addressed issues related to the need to protect yourself from the sun, behavioral strategies related to using sunprotective measures, personal and social images of having a tan, the use of sun-safe clothing, and howto change their schools through forms of structural change. Pre-and postintervention measures among junior high school students showed greatest improvement in the intervention groups knowledge scores and minimal changes in sun protection behavior from Grade 8 to Grade 9, which were not maintained through Grade 10. Results of the study highlight some limitations of school-based interventions for changing sun protection behaviors.
Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 3,
396-408 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/109019819902600309

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. B. Patterson, P. Hawe, P. Clarke, C. Krause, M. van Dijk, Y. Penman, and A. Shiell
The Worldview of Hospital Security Staff: Implications for Health Promotion Policy Implementation
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,
June 1, 2009;
38(3):
336 - 357.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J Dobbinson, V. White, M. A Wakefield, K. M Jamsen, V. White, P. M Livingston, D. R English, and J. A Simpson
Adolescents' use of purpose built shade in secondary schools: cluster randomised controlled trial
BMJ,
February 17, 2009;
338(feb17_1):
b95 - b95.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Kyle, J. K. Hammitt, H. W. Lim, A. C. Geller, L. H. Hall-Jordan, E. W. Maibach, E. C. De Fabo, and M. C. Wagner
Economic Evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency's SunWise Program: Sun Protection Education for Young Children
Pediatrics,
May 1, 2008;
121(5):
e1074 - e1084.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. E. Clowers-Webb, L. J. Christenson, P. K. Phillips, R. K. Roenigk, T. H. Nguyen, A. L. Weaver, and C. C. Otley
Educational Outcomes Regarding Skin Cancer in Organ Transplant Recipients: Randomized Intervention of Intensive vs Standard Education.
Arch Dermatol,
June 1, 2006;
142(6):
712 - 718.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Schofield, M. Lynagh, and G. Mishra
Evaluation of a Health Promoting Schools program to reduce smoking in Australian secondary schools
Health Educ. Res.,
December 1, 2003;
18(6):
678 - 692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|