| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/109019819402200306 Settings as an Important Dimension in Health Education/Promotion Policy, Programs, and ResearchCenter for Health Promotion, Research, and Development, School of Public Health, University of Texas
College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
School of Public Health, University of Minnesota
Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin
School of Public Health, Division of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Saint Louis University
Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences
Department of Community Health, University of Illinois
Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina Settingscommunity, worksite, schools, and healthcare sitesconstitute an important dimension of health education/health promotion policy and programs and for research about program needs, feasibility, efficacy, and effectiveness. These settings vary in the extent of coverage of and relationships with their respective constituencies, valued outcomes, and quantity and quality of evidence about the effectiveness of setting-specific and cross-setting programs. Main sources of evidence for program efficacy and effectiveness are summarized, leading to the conclusion that strides have been made toward building a strong evidentiary base for health education/health promotion in these settings. Gaps in research exist, especially for diffusion of effective programs, new technologies, the influence of policy, relations between settings, and approaches to marginal and special subgroups. Recommendations are offered for cross-setting and within-setting research related to intervention.
|