Health Education & Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oldenburg, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gomel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oldenburg, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gomel, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 22, No. 1, 9-19 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/109019819502200103

An Economic Evaluation of Four Work Site Based Cardiovascular Risk Factor Interventions

Brian Oldenburg, PhD

Neville Owen, PhD

Michael Parle

Michelle Gomel, PhD

We used outcome data from a randomized work site intervention trial to examine the cost-effectiveness of four cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction programs: health risk assessment (HRA), risk factor education (RFE), behavioral counseling (BC), and behavioral counseling plus incentives (BCI). Composite CVD risk scores were derived from measures of serum total cholesterol, blood pressure, number of cigarettes smoked, body mass index, and aerobic capacity. The economic evaluation of the programs focused on the subset of costs most sensitive to the differences between the interventions, and a sensitivity analysis examined some of the relevant cost variations. At the 6-month follow-up (i.e., the "action" or initiation stage of lifestyle change), the RFE, BC, and BCI interventions produced a significant reduction in cardiovascular risk. Incremental analyses demonstrated RFE to be more cost-effective, but not as clinically effective as BC; BC was more cost-effective than RFE when assessment costs were included, and BCI was judged to be the least cost-effective. At the 12-month follow-up (i.e., the "maintenance" stage of lifestyle of change), BC was the only program found to produce a significant reduction in CVD risk. Individualized behavioral counseling was found to be a cost-effective strategy for the initiation and maintenance of CVD risk factor reduction.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?