Health Education & Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Windsor, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Windsor, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 20, No. 3, 327-345 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/109019819302000305

A Meta-Evaluation of Nutrition Education Intervention Research among Pregnant Women

Neal Richard Boyd

Richard A. Windsor

Inadequate nutrition during pregnancy retards human fetal growth and increases the risk of delivering a low birthweight (LBW) infant. Some studies place particular emphasis on reducing LBW through improved nutrition. Consensus documents have strongly recommended intense nutrition education programs for patients at risk. Despite this well-defined need few methodologically rigorous studies have been conducted to evaluate the behavioral impact of nutrition education for pregnant patients. Criteria are recommended in the following areas: (1) research design, (2) sample size and power, (3) specification of population characteristics, (4) measurement quality, and (5) replication. The methodological quality of completed evaluations are reviewed using these criteria. The authors advocate guidelines for future investigators for conducting rigorous trials in this critical public health area.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?