This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gittelsohn, J. Articles by Anliker, J. A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gittelsohn, J. Articles by Anliker, J. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Urban Food Store Intervention Positively Affects Food-Related Psychosocial Variables and Food Behaviors

¹ Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
² Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
³ Nutrition Research Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
⁴ National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
⁵ University of Massachusetts, Amherst

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jgittels{at}jhsph.edu.

	Abstract

Obesity and other diet-related chronic diseases are more prevalent in low-income urban areas, which commonly have limited access to healthy foods. The authors implemented an intervention trial in nine food stores, including two supermarkets and seven corner stores, in a low-income, predominantly African American area of Baltimore City, with a comparison group of eight stores in another low-income area of the city. The intervention (Baltimore Healthy Stores; BHS) included an environmental component to increase stocks of more nutritious foods and provided point-of-purchase promotions including signage for healthy choices and interactive nutrition education sessions. Using pre- and postassessments, the authors evaluated the impact of the program on 84 respondents sampled from the intervention and comparison areas. Exposure to intervention materials was modest in the intervention area, and overall healthy food purchasing scores, food knowledge, and self-efficacy did not show significant improvements associated with intervention status. However, based on adjusted multivariate regression results, the BHS program had a positive impact on healthfulness of food preparation methods and showed a trend toward improved intentions to make healthy food choices. Respondents in the intervention areas were significantly more likely to report purchasing promoted foods because of the presence of a BHS shelf label. This is the first food store intervention trial in low-income urban communities to show positive impacts at the consumer level.

First published on November 3, 2009
Health Education & Behavior 2009, doi:10.1177/1090198109343886


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?