|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A Comparison of Face-to-Face or Internet-Delivered Physical Activity Intervention on Targeted Determinants
Rebekah M. Steele, PhD1*,
W. K. Mummery, PhD2,
and
Trudy Dwyer, PhD2
1 Institute of Metabolic Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom
2 College of Health and Human Services, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Health, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rebekah.steele{at}mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
This article describes the equivalency testing results of a 12-week behavior change program on targeted determinates of physical activity (PA) and self-reported health status. Participants (n = 192) were randomized to face-to-face, combined Internet and face-to-face, and Internet-only groups. Equivalency testing was used to examine differences and statistical equivalency across groups for all outcome measures (social support, self-efficacy, perceived health status, and motivational readiness for PA). Participants were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and 2 and 5 months postintervention. Motivational readiness for PA increased across all groups. The face-to-face and combined groups showed changes in social support; however, they were not statistically different and were equivalent. There were no changes in self-efficacy or physical health status. Overall face-to-face and the Internet delivery modes show similar results. If Internet-based programs can be shown to be as effective as face-to-face, they may in turn be a more efficient and cost-effective delivery method.
First published on June 5, 2009 Health Education & Behavior 2009, doi:10.1177/1090198109335802

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|