This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1090198108329998v1 36/6/999    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schwartz, M. B. Articles by Fiore, S. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schwartz, M. B. Articles by Fiore, S. S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Impact of Removing Snacks of Low Nutritional Value From Middle Schools

¹ Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
² Department of Psychology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York
³ Connecticut State Department of Education, Middletown

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: marlene.schwartz{at}yale.edu.

	Abstract

Removing low nutrition snacks from schools is controversial. Although the objective is to decrease the consumption of these foods at school, some critics argue that children will compensate by eating more of these foods at home. Others worry that school-based obesity prevention programs will increase student preoccupation with weight. The present study examines these concerns. Three middle schools replaced snacks and beverages that did not meet nutrition guidelines, whereas three comparison schools made no systematic changes. Students were surveyed about dietary intake and weight concerns before and after implementation of the intervention. Findings indicate that removing low nutrition items from schools decreased students’ consumption with no compensatory increase at home. Furthermore, there were no differences in students’ reported weight concerns. These results support the value of strengthening school nutrition standards to improve student nutrition and provide evidence dispelling concerns that such efforts will have unintended negative consequences.

First published on February 5, 2009, doi:10.1177/1090198108329998

Health Education & Behavior 2009;36:999.

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?