This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1090198108322820v1 36/5/895    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Della, L. J. Articles by Lance, C. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Della, L. J. Articles by Lance, C. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Explaining Fruit and Vegetable Intake Using a Consumer Marketing Tool

¹ Department of Communication, University of Louisville
² Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, University of Georgia
³ Department of Psychology, University of Georgia

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lindsay.della{at}gmail.com.

	Abstract

In response to calls to reinvent the 5 A Day fruit and vegetable campaign, this study assesses the utility of VALS^TM, a consumer-based audience segmentation tool that divides the U.S. population into groups leading similar lifestyles. The study examines whether the impact of theory of planned behavior (TPB) constructs varies across VALS groups in a cross-sectional sample of 1,588 U.S. adults. In a multigroup structural equation model, the VALS audience group variable moderated latent TPB relationships. Attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control explained 57% to 70% of the variation in intention to eat fruit and vegetables across 5 different VALS groups. Perceived behavioral control and intention also predicted self-reported consumption behavior (R² = 20% to 71% across VALS groups). Bivariate z tests were calculated to determine statistical differences in parameter estimates across groups. Nine of the bivariate z tests were statistically significant (p .04), with standardized coefficients ranging from .05 to .70. These findings confirm the efficacy of using the TPB to explain variation in fruit and vegetable consumption as well as the validity of using a consumer-based algorithm to segment audiences for fruit and vegetable consumption messaging.

First published on January 21, 2009, doi:10.1177/1090198108322820

Health Education & Behavior 2009;36:895.

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?