This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Leventhal, H. Articles by Panagis, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Leventhal, H. Articles by Panagis, D. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Impact of Communications on the Self-Regulation of Health Beliefs, Decisions, and Behavior

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, 1202 West Johnson, Madison, WI 53706

Martin A. Safer, Ph.D.

Department of Psychology, Catholic University

Daphne M. Panagis, Ph.D.

West Coast Cancer Foundation

The models used in the study of communication and health behavior have changed from those describing how to impose health actions on relatively passive respondents to models describing how respondents regulate their own health practices. We have traced the change from the fear-drive model, which described how fear induced change, to the parallel response model, which described how subjects processed information and generated coping responses to solve the problem posed by both the objective health threat and by their subjective fear. The data supporting this change showed that increasing fear led to more favorable attitudes but that fear alone was insufficient to create action: Specific action instructions had to be added to both high and low fear and both combinations produced the same level of health action. Neither the data nor the parallel model specified what subjects learned about the threat that made exposure to a high or low fear message necessary for behavior change. The parallel response model has been elaborated into a more complete systems model and new studies show how health threats are represented. They have found attributes such as IDENTITY (label and symptoms), CAUSES, TIME LINES or duration, and CONSEQUENCES, that set goals and criteria to generate and evaluate problem solving (coping) behavior. Suggestions are made for applying this more complete model to public health practice.

Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 10, No. 1, 3-29 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/109019818301000101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?